Isn't it nice that suddenly the Liberals are all bi-partisan so much so that they want the Conservatives to accept the Liberal position on Afghanistan.
The Liberals and Conservatives are of course bi-partisan on Afghanistan in that neither want to end the mission. The differences have to do with the role and emphasis. As some have pointed out the Liberal position on combat is a non-starter as long as the troops are there especially in the south.
What is clear is that the Liberals are desperate to avoid an election on Afghanistan and the Conservatives will probably rely on that but they may be willing to make some symbolic moves towards the Liberal position to maintain an image of bipartisanship of course all in the interests of the Canadian people!
This is from the horse's mouse (or something) the Liberal website. All is sweetness and light between Dion and Harper because both have our interests at heart.
Open Letter to Prime Minister Stephen Harper from the Hon. Stéphane Dion, Leader of the Opposition
February 15, 2008Dear Prime Minister, Today Canada carries a heavy burden in Afghanistan. Our brave men and women in the Canadian Forces and our civilian officials face very real risks every day, as they serve their country and the people of Afghanistan by working to bring hope and stability to this troubled region. We are in agreement that we cannot abandon the people of Afghanistan, as there remains much to be done to ensure that the stability and governance institutions are in place to allow Afghans themselves to resolve their differences. But Liberals recognize that Canada’s mission has to change. We cannot simply continue to extend the same mission indefinitely. That is why we have provided the government with an alternative plan for the future of Canada’s mission in Afghanistan. The Liberal plan is consistent with our longstanding position that Canada’s mission in Kandahar must change in February 2009. It brings clarity to our goals in Afghanistan by placing a greater emphasis on stronger and more disciplined diplomatic efforts, and striking a better balance with respect to the reconstruction and development efforts that will be essential to creating a stable Afghanistan. In drafting this new wording, we were guided by three simple principles that we thought were lacking from the government’s motion: • The mission must change – NATO must ensure the rotation of new troops into Kandahar so that Canadian troops can shift in February 2009 to training of the Afghan National Army and police, and protection of reconstruction efforts; • The mission must end – we must have a clear end date of February 2011, not a further review date that will lead us down the path of a never-ending mission; and • The mission must be about more than the military – there is no exclusively military solution to the conflict in Afghanistan so our efforts must be balanced between defence, diplomacy and development. Liberals also believe that clarity, honesty and transparency are essential to the success of the mission. To this end, we believe, and our amended motion stipulates, that the government should provide the public with franker and much more frequent reporting on events in Afghanistan. For example, Canadians’ faith in the Afghan mission has been undermined by the troubling reports of abuse in Afghan prisons and the government’s secrecy surrounding these allegations. Canadians must have faith that core values, including respect for human rights and the belief in the dignity of all people, are at the heart of this mission. In the coming weeks we will continue our national debate on Afghanistan. It is my continued belief that the future of Canada’s mission should be openly discussed in Parliament with all of Canada watching. On Tuesday, we put forward this clear and substantive position, which we believe represents the common ground that best reflects the values of the majority of Canadians. The government immediately expressed openness to our position. It is my hope that you will consider accepting the terms of the Liberal motion, which was put forward with the objective of defining values and goals for the mission that all Canadians can respect, and not with partisan political calculations in mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment